๐ง Introduction
With the overwhelming buzz surrounding AI tools, it’s easy to get swept up by marketing hype or download counts. Every day a new tool launches, and every week a startup announces its integration with a smart model—flooding the landscape with promises and claims. But the practical reality is very different: not every popular tool is actually used, and not every well-funded app is trusted in production environments. Startups, operating under pressure and limited resources, don’t choose tools based on noise—they choose based on real value delivered in daily workflows. Which leads to a critical question:
What are the AI tools that startups actually pay to use?
That’s exactly what a new report from Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), in partnership with Mercury, set out to answer. By analyzing real spending data from over 200,000 startups, the report identifies which tools are actively used in production—not just downloaded or hyped.
Far from theoretical evaluations, this report offers a grounded look at the AI tools that drive real work and receive real dollars—making it a vital reference for developers, investors, and product builders.
๐งช Report Methodology: How Was the Data Collected?
What sets this report apart is its reliance on actual financial data—not surveys or user reviews. The data was sourced through Mercury, a financial services platform that manages bank accounts for over 200,000 startups. This means the report reflects real spending on AI tools, excluding free trials or experimental usage. Such a methodology gives the report high credibility and makes it a reliable snapshot of true market behavior.
๐ Read also:Things You Should Never Share with AI Tools: A Comprehensive Guide to Protecting Your Privacy in 2025
๐ What Did the a16z Report Reveal?
Published on October 2, 2025, under the title: "AI Application Spending Report: Where Startup Dollars Really Go", this is the first report of its kind to rely on verified financial data from startups, rather than surface-level metrics like user counts or funding rounds.
The key findings highlighted in the report include:
Startups are actively spending on AI tools that enhance human productivity—not on fully autonomous systems
Tools like ChatGPT, Anthropic, Midjourney, Lorikeet, Perplexity AI ranked among the top 50 in actual spending
There’s a clear preference for “copilot” tools—smart assistants that support teams—over full automation agents
Lesser-known tools like Lorikeet (an Australian company focused on customer service automation) outperformed big names like Canva and Perplexity
The report is based on real banking data, not estimates—giving it unmatched accuracy
๐ Top Tools Featured in the Report
1. OpenAI (ChatGPT)
Still leading the pack, especially for writing, coding, and customer support tasks.
2. Anthropic (Claude)
Increasingly adopted by startups seeking more privacy control, especially in finance and healthcare.
3. Midjourney
Evolved from an artistic tool into a productivity asset for design and marketing teams.
4. Lorikeet
An under-the-radar Australian company that surpassed Canva in actual spending, thanks to its customizable customer service automation.
5. Perplexity AI
Used as a smart research assistant, though it ranked lower than expected in spending.
⚙️ Real Impact on Startup Productivity
Actual spending on AI tools isn’t just about usage—it reflects measurable impact. According to the report’s analysis, the top-spending tools contributed to:
Up to 40% reduction in task completion time for marketing and content teams
Improved response quality in customer support via tools like Lorikeet
Faster design and visual production using Midjourney
Enhanced coding and analysis workflows powered by ChatGPT and Claude
This direct boost in productivity is why startups are willing to pay for these tools, even when free or open-source alternatives exist.
๐ Read also: AI Burnout: Why Using Too Many AI Tools Can Kill Your Productivity
๐ Future Outlook: How Will AI Spending Evolve?
Based on current trends, the report suggests several shifts in AI tool spending for 2026:
Increased investment in sector-specific tools (e.g., medical, legal, financial AI apps)
Decline in generic tools in favor of customized, integrated solutions
Rise of new entrants offering API-first platforms with flexible deployment
Greater demand for tools that combine text, image, and voice into unified experiences
These projections indicate a maturing market, where startups prioritize real value and seamless integration over novelty.
๐งต Final Analysis: What Does This Report Really Tell Us?
The a16z report doesn’t just list tools—it reveals how the startup world truly engages with AI. While some tools dominate headlines through marketing and funding, startups are choosing different solutions—ones that deliver tangible results and integrate smoothly into daily operations.
This report exposes the gap between media hype and actual usage, and reinforces that:
Real value lies in performance, not popularity
The most used AI tools are those that support—not replace—human teams
Startups don’t have time for experiments; they need instant, measurable impact
Lesser-known tools can outperform global giants if they solve real problems
For developers, this report offers a roadmap to build adoptable tools. For investors, it signals where real money is flowing—not just where noise is loudest. And for content creators, it’s a chance to align with what the market truly cares about—not just what’s trending.
AI isn’t measured by what’s said about it—it’s measured by what’s actually used.